Community

Coordinate working groups for open competency data.

OSC shows formats for expert exchange, pilot work and transfer. Working groups document requirements, open questions and review results so skills data can evolve across organizations in a traceable way. Results are described as recommendations only after review.

View events Suggest topic

Formats

Formats for exchange, pilot work and transfer.

Each format has a clear result: a data model, an example, a decision template or documented practical experience. Contributions remain identifiable as working drafts until review and release.

Format 1

Working groups

Domain and technical groups deepen data models, evidence and governance as working drafts.

Format 2

Pilot sprints

Members review reference patterns with concrete use cases and document results.

Format 3

Open materials

Practice reports, playbooks and reference artifacts should be provided as reviewed working drafts.

Working groups

Active working groups from TGroups.

The overview loads publishable working groups from TGroup objects in the current environment. Private or closed groups are not included in this public feed.

Request participation
Working groups are loading.

Work cycle

Need, pilot, review, publication.

Community activities connect open discussion with binding documentation. Each session should produce a concrete artifact: field list, example, decision template or review result.

Find next event Suggest topic
  1. 01Describe need and audience
  2. 02Commission working group or sprint
  3. 03Test with examples and review questions
  4. 04Document result, limits and next steps

Participation

Open entry. Binding documentation.

Community contributions are curated. New participants find orientation without having to declare membership immediately. Working groups document decisions, open questions and review results.

Follow

Follow public updates

News, events and result notes show which topics are in progress and where feedback is needed.

View updates
Contribute

Submit use case or review question

A concrete need helps review standards against data, roles, interfaces and decisions.

Suggest topic
Review with us

Support working groups and pilot work

Participants can prioritize requirements, review artifacts, classify pilot findings and document implementations.

View participation

Results

Exchange becomes reviewable working drafts.

Community formats are designed for usable interim results. That helps participants quickly see what is already clarified and where more expertise is needed.

Models

Field lists and terms

Shared minimum fields, definitions and open semantic questions are versioned.

Practice

Examples and pilot notes

Use cases show which assumptions work and which limits become visible.

Review

Review questions and decisions

Working groups record what was decided, deferred or marked for legal review.

Transfer

Materials for implementation teams

Playbooks, reference artifacts and notes support the next implementation step.

Upcoming events

Exchange on working groups and pilot work.

All events